Some of the brightest people ever will be entering college in the next few years – but they will also be students with more early exposure to behavioral and pain medications and with higher rates of anxiety and depression.
In short, they will be a perfect storm for substance use.
According to an ongoing study by Amelia M. Arria, et al, By their sophomore year in college nearly all students had the opportunity to try alcohol and a large majority had the chance to try marijuana and tobacco. About half had the chance to try prescription stimulants non-medically. Importantly, several other illicit drugs were also available to a substantial minority of students, with exposure opportunity exceeding 20%t for hallucinogens, prescription analgesics, ecstasy, and cocaine.
Furthermore, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism tracks alcohol-related issues across our college campuses to find that
Dr. Wood took the time to speak to us about solutions he foresees on his campus and beyond. You can read his responses below.
We found that with depression and anxiety, traditional screening methods were effective in motivating students to follow-up on a referral to counseling.
In other words, students who scored high on assessments measuring the frequency/duration of these symptoms were likely to seek counseling.
However, this was not the case with alcohol. Student behavior was not affected by simply measuring the frequency of their use. It didn’t matter if these screenings took place in the counseling center, within primary health, during orientation, through the athletic department, etc. I think the reason is that according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 60% of college students drink, and 2/3 of these students engage in binge drinking. Most college students know this, and use this knowledge to minimize how often or how much they abuse alcohol.
AAC: What solutions are you working on or what have you learned that may help you overcome the challenges you’ve identified? Dr. Wood: Responding to these challenges requires targeting both the individual student as well as the campus community. Regarding individual interventions, it’s more effective to assess the impact of a student’s substance use. For example, I often ask students how they would know if they are involved in an unhealthy/abusive dating relationship. The student typically responds with a series of questions such as “How much money do I spend on this partner, is the relationship interfering with my school work, are there parts of the relationship that I hide from my close friends, do I ever feel ashamed or insecure when I’m with this partner, etc.” Then I ask the student to view their substance use as a relationship, and ponder if this relationship is healthy or not. Such is an example of using an interpersonal approach to motivational interviewing, which research has shown to be very effective.
Regarding campus wide interventions, developing a bystander intervention program is by far the most effective campus wide intervention. In fact, some argue it’s the only effective campus wide intervention. The hallmark of a bystander program is providing information on how to help a friend in distress. The assumptions being that students are less resistant to this message, are still getting knowledge about local resources, and will use these resources themselves if needed. Such a program also interjects help-seeking into the vernacular of the campus culture, and this is vital for us.
In terms of addressing parent concerns in general, I always suggest parents learn about the counseling resources on campus, as well as other support systems such as the Dean of Students and Housing & Residence Life. I also encourage parents to let someone know if they have concerns about their child. Most universities have resources either on campus, or providers in the local community, which can be of assistance.
AAC: Do you see that more students are coming in with a complex of issues, both physical (e.g. pain), substance-related and mental health? Dr. Wood: Unfortunately YES to this question… 2018 will be the last graduating college class of the Millennial Generation. After that, the ‘Digital Native Generation’ (or whatever ends up being their official name) will make up the entire student body. We know this later generation is very intelligent, highly creative, and very much high achieving. We also know that an overwhelming majority of them will attend college.
Sadly, we also know that as compared to prior generations, these students will have more prior history with mental health issues (depression and anxiety), will have a lower age of when they first tried alcohol or drugs, be more likely to have been prescribed psychotropic medication, and will likely know someone who has either been sexually assaulted or attempted suicide…and all of this prior to starting college.
AAC: In what areas of drug/alcohol use are you seeing an uptick in recent years? What types of student issues – other than school stress – may be exacerbating drug use on campuses? Dr. Wood: Outside of alcohol, which most schools are reporting an uptick…abusing prescription medication, marijuana use, steroid use among college men (actually any addictions related to food and body dysmorphia) are also increasing. A growing concern is cocaine use among college students. Not only is the number of students using cocaine rising, but…to be direct…drug dealers tend not to give college students pure cocaine. Usually the “cocaine” is mixed with items such as bleach and other household materials. Thus, we are seeing students going to the hospital for overdoses, contributed to by ingesting hazardous materials.
AAC: What substance or mental-health-related problems among our college populations do you feel are currently not being addressed adequately, either across campuses, in the media, or on your specific campus?
Dr. Wood: This is another OUTSTANDING question! My first response is a personal observation. I serve as a reviewer for the Journal of American College Health, and read manuscripts related to the research that hasn’t been published yet. I’ve seen multiple reports that the number of students who don’t drink AT ALL while in college is increasing. I have never seen a meta-analysis on this…but why is this group increasing? No one studies, or talks about this group. Instead, we focus on the students who are abusing substances. However, studying the growing number of students who don’t use substances at all could highlight protective factors that no one is even thinking of…
We have success stories related to individual students all the time. This is my favorite part of my job, and why I love what I do!
I can’t give identifying specifies, but a parent recently called our office about their child. The student was a freshman and had a campus alcohol violation during the first semester. The student also failed a recent drug test, which prompted the parent to call our office. Long story short, I talked with the parents and the student. The student disclosed a history of drug abuse that the parents didn’t even know about, and now the student is in treatment. Such stories are not uncommon for our office, but it shows how this issue can affect a family.
AAC: Do you feel your school is atypical in terms of suicide or substance use numbers or is it in keeping with national numbers?
Dr. Wood: TCU is not an exception, and our community lost 4 students to suicide in 2010. This affected our campus deeply, and we were already a national leader in terms of suicide preventions as we joined the College Depression Partnership in 2008. Sadly, universities are challenged to defy statistics in terms of suicide prevention. Statistically speaking, there is 1 completed suicide on campus for every 10,000 students (so a school of 50,000 students would average 5 completed suicides). We obviously don’t accept this statistic as reality, but every year that goes by without a completed suicide is worth mentioning.
AAC: What is your professional opinion as to why the 18 – 24 year-old population is so vulnerable to suicide? In the college environment, how likely is it that this complex precipitated or exacerbated by school-related issues or incidents? Dr. Wood: Yes, completed suicides, and suicide attempts, are a growing national concern for colleges and universities.
18-24 year olds are the second leading demographic for suicide attempts (behind the elderly). There are several reasons for this; but in my opinion, a main contributing factor is the amount of change a college student experiences, and a reduction in resiliency. As a psychologist, I don’t view stress as how many good or bad things are happening, but how much change a person is experiencing. For the typical college student, literally every aspect of their lives includes change; from where they live, their social identity, their daily routine, their relationships, etc. In addition to this, college students are a leading demographic for high risk behaviors. In addition to this, college students are a leading demographic for substance abuse. Furthermore, their internal world is also changing in terms of emotional functioning, physical bodies, and even their brain is changing.
It’s also worth noting that 18-24 years old is when most psychological disorders such as depression, psychosis, and addictions first emerge. On top of all this, there is the inherent stress of grades and academics…
AAC: Do you interface much with the local Crisis Intervention center and how would that work? If so, what is that relationship like – how are the limits of what you can could it be improved?
Dr. Wood: We have a 24/7counseling line specific for TCU students. We use ‘Protocall’ for this service, and promote it as an extension of the counseling center.
The phone counselors are licensed therapists and it’s confidential, in that only counseling center staff knows if a student calls. The relationship has been very positive.
The students really like the service, and it has been a great way to encourage students to seek counseling. We also have occasions in which students call about thoughts of suicide, and the phone counselor can then contact a staff counselor, as well as the campus police.
AAC: Who on campus do you feel you could reach that you are not reaching and why? What things prevent or encourage students to seek your services? Do many students take the screenings and have you had success stories that came to you through the screenings? Dr. Wood: One of our challenges is connecting with students who live off-campus (primarily juniors and seniors). If they wanted, these students could come and go to class without any other interaction with the campus community. These students are also a target group for our prevention efforts, because they often set the tone in terms of alcohol use, parties, etc.
Yes, we pride ourselves in having campus wide screenings as part of our prevention programs. Our health center, which sees about 50% of the student body, utilizes the same screening measures as our counseling center, and they developed procedures in terms of referring students to counseling. We also have an anonymous online screening program available on our counseling center website.
AAC: What are some of your counseling center’s recent substance-use-related initiatives – around awareness, around prevention, or around seeking help?
Dr. Wood: We launched our “R U Okay” campaign in 2011 as part of a federally funded grant to increase our suicide prevention program on campus. The grant, which was through the Department of Health, ended in 2015, but TCU has since sustained the program. This is a bystander intervention program, and our design was to eventually have three tracks with suicide prevention, eating disorder, and substance abuse. However, the students ran with the idea, and are now using this campaign, or variations of it, to promote awareness for any type of distress. For example, our Student Government Association launched an “It’s Okay Not to be Okay” program this last Fall, and it was very successful. In fact, since 2011, the number of students coming to the counseling center has increased by over 45%!